Hannan’s cosy take on the Freedom Association

McWhirter

Norris McWhirter: the world was so much better in black and white

David Baddiel has put Dan Hannan’s nose out of joint by announcing on a programme on BBC Radio 5 that The Freedom Association (Dan is a member of the council, though he doesn’t mention this in his blog) is kind of “sub-BNP”. Our Dan isn’t happy. He says,

If I complained about every instance of BBC Leftism, I’d never blog anything else. Although the Beeb has tried to address the overt partisanship in its news department, many of its drama, comedy and consumer affairs programmes remain as jejune as ever. (All Rightists are evil, every Tory is one step away from Hitler, won’t it be hilarious when Thatcher dies etc.)

Hmmm, he clearly hasn’t paid much attention to the BBC’s news output since the Tory-led government took power. The BBC has practically bent over backwards to please the government. Its coverage of anything that occurs outside the faux left-right axis of Parliamentary politics has been woeful. That aside, Hannan’s take on both The Freedom Association and the McWhirter brothers is informed wholly by his membership of the organisation. You could say, that in a Bourdieusian sense at least, that he’s brought both his political and cultural capital to bear on this blog. Let’s read on,

Norris, whom I got to know as a teenager, was a kind, generous and modest man: a man of real and deep friendships, who had the gift of kindling enthusiasm in others.

Good for you. Presumably this happened while you were at Marlborough or did he pop out to Peru to hang out on your parent’s ranch? He continues,

This shouldn’t need saying, but since Mr Davies is throwing Mosleyite slanders around (they were, incidentally, blackshirts, not brownshirts), it’s worth recording that Norris played his part in the war against Hitler, serving in the Royal Navy. He was, above all, a lover of freedom: he could see that the corporatist Heath-Wilson state was deleterious to personal liberty as well as to economic prosperity. Nowadays, most of us can see that, but in the 1970s his was a brave and lonely voice.

What Dan overlooks from the lofty height of his ivory tower is that The Freedom Association is a very right-wing organisation that supported the apartheid regime in South Africa which it described as a “free country” that was part of the “free world” (sic). TFA also supported the English cricket tour of  South Africa in the early 1980’s. TFA’s reason for doing this had nothing at all to do with freedom, it was an expression of solidarity with a vile right wing regime whose idea of freedom was relative to a person’s skin colour. It can therefore be argued that Hendrik Verwoed loved freedom too.

Dan provides us with a link to Thomas Cranmer’s (not the very dead archbishop) website. Cranmer says,

But during the Radio 5 interview is an appalling misrepresentation by Baddiel of The Freedom Association, which Norris established in 1975 with his twin brother Ross and Viscount De L’Isle. The Association is at the forefront of campaigning in defence of personal and political freedom.

The TFA do what? That’s funny, I thought they actively supported regimes that offered no personal or political freedoms – especially if you’re poor or working class. Countries like Pinochet’s Chile were considered worthy of their support. That’s not just glaringly obvious hypocrisy, it’s a perversion of the English language. TFA does not stand for freedom  –  at least not the kind of freedom that is accessible to all.

Indeed, the TFA make every effort to stifle people’s freedoms. During the Grunwick dispute, TFA was involved in John Gouriet’s strike-breaking efforts (Gouriet was a founding member of TFA). TFA are against people’s right to join a trade union, which means that they are against free association…unless you happen to be a member of TFA or any other right wing group of course.

TFA was involved in the March for Free Expression in 2006. The subject of their ire wasn’t the fact that someone had accused the McWhirter brothers of being fascist (their political views were quite clearly very close to fascism) but the fact that they wanted to “express solidarity with the right-wing Danish paper Jyllands-Posten” over its decision to print racist and anti-Muslim cartoons.

One of the official sponsors of the “March for Free Expression” was the Freedom Association, whose campaign director Mark Wallace was a platform speaker at the Trafalgar Square rally. This organisation gained notoriety in the 1970s for its energetic defence of the “freedom” of Grunwicks to oppress and exploit its employees without interference from the trade unions. Equally energetically, it has defended the right of racists to promote hostility towards minority ethnic communities.

While I am not a fan of David Baddiel, he does have a perfectly valid point about TFA and the McWhirter brothers.  The only defence that Hannan can muster in support of McWhirter is,

…it’s worth recording that Norris played his part in the war against Hitler, serving in the Royal Navy.

That proves nothing. In fact, some of the most rabid fascists in this country “fought against Hitler”. Colin Jordan who founded the National Socialist Movement was in the army with the Royal Army Educational Corps during WWII. He ostensibly ‘fought against Hitler’.

Meanwhile on TFA’s website, they’re calling for Baddiel to be sued for slander. Seriously! I kid you not. So concerned are TFA with this notion of freedom of speech that they’re trying to silence someone from expressing their views. Over-sensitive to the point of the absurd and demonstrably against anything that doesn’t conform to their notion of freedom, TFA actively seeks to curb the freedoms of others. In their exhortation to their members they say,

TFA is built on core values of promoting individual freedoms and civil liberties for all, which is why we are so shocked that Baddiel chose to compare us to the British National Party (BNP). The views of the BNP are the ideological opposite to those of The Freedom Association.

TFA promotes ‘freedom’ – which is why it works to break strikes and smash unions. TFA are probably closer to the BNP than they realize (the BNP supported apartheid-era South Africa too). In fact, under the Nazis, trade unions were banned.  That’s a historical fact that has passed Hannan by and he’s got a degree from Oxford in…wait for it…history.  I suspect that the phrase “historical materialism” is one that never passes his lips.

While TFA claim to be advocates of freedom, the ultimate expression of their ideas would be an authoritarian state ruled by some caudillo who would look after the interests of capital, while suppressing dissent and enslaving those who literally cannot pay for their freedom.

This sudden jerky movement from TFA should only be seen one way: as an attempt to control discourse.

UPDATE: 22/1/11 @ 1044

This blog has been linked to a TFA blog about an article written by Quentin Letts of the Daily Mail. The article contains one noticeable factual error

He also suggested that his libertarian organisation, The Freedom Foundation, was akin to the BNP.

Letts is supposed to be a professional  journalist and here he is getting the name wrong! The Freedom Foundation is an alcohol and drug dependency charity. Duh.

Advertisements

9 Comments

Filed under Ideologies, Ideologies, Language, Media, Society & culture

9 responses to “Hannan’s cosy take on the Freedom Association

  1. I find it very ironic that the “freedom association” goes on about freedom of speech but yet wants to censor someone for expressing a political view. Perhaps “freedom” doesn’t apply to left wingers!

  2. Yeah, it sort of defeats the object of their raison d’etre really. Freedom for them is a value-loaded word that is a symbolic expression of their cultural and political capital and no more.

  3. yeah that’s basically it. Still we wont let these tory cunts win

  4. Pingback: Hannan: McWhirter was a decent man (because I say so) | Guy Debord's Cat

  5. Freedom

    Its an incorrect political view though. The TFA is not a racist organization and nothing like the BNP. And McWhirter is certainly not a Nazi. These comments are slander and easily constitute defamation. I

    • So TFA’s support for the racist regime in South Africa was what? Did TFA support apartheid or not? Baddiel’s comments are opinions, nothing more. For a pressure group that is supposed to advocate freedom, you spend an enormous amount of time denying freedom to others – as is evidenced by your threat to sue Baddiel for defamation.

      What is an “incorrect political view”? This would imply that TFA has its own sense of political correctness.

  6. David Joseph

    “TFA are against people’s right to join a trade union”—-no, they are opposed to the closed shop.
    “racist and anti-Muslim cartoons” – Islam is not a race.The cartoons depicted the Prophet Mohammed (pbuh).
    No, TFA did not support apartheid.

    • “no, they are opposed to the closed shop”

      I guess you’re not old enough to remember Grunwick.

      “Islam is not a race”

      Which is usually uttered by racists when they defend their anti-Muslimism.

      “No, TFA did not support apartheid”

      Weasel words. TFA didn’t complain about the treatment of blacks, coloureds and Asians under the apartheid system. In fact, TFA’s actions encouraged the continuation of apartheid.

  7. beastrabban

    Reblogged this on Beastrabban’s Weblog and commented:
    More on Daniel Hannan’s attack on David Baddiel for daring to suggest that The Freedom Association and its founder, Norris McWhirter, were Fascists. It’s important, because it points out that the Freedom Association was founded in 1975 by the McWhirter brothers and Viscount de L’Isle. It also points out that they supported apartheid-era South Africa and General Pinochet’s Chile. They have also attempted to break strikes, as this piece has also shown. If I remember correctly, it wasn’t just Chile the Freedom Association supported. They also gave their support to other brutal Fascist regimes in South and Central America. It’s therefore, in my opinion, fair to say that the McWhirters and the Freedom Association are Fascistic. This is important as Hannan is a Tory MP for Devon and Telegraph columnist. He is also a member of the Freedom Association’s council. He’s proof that despite Cameron severing ties with the Monday, the Tories still have very strong connections to the extreme, Fascistic Right.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s