Tag Archives: Better Schools programme

Gove: “Won’t someone think of the children”?

The  government approach to the public sector strikes – particularly the teacher’s strike tomorrow – is quite simply, appalling. In response to the teacher’s strike, the government has resorted to the classic tactic of using emotional  blackmail and blatant misrepresentations to try and sway public opinion in their favour. All of a sudden, single parents matter when they never mattered to them before. The children – the pupils – are also being dragged into this. “Won’t someone think of them”? But these words are hollow and insincere and amount to little more than public relations gimmicks. That shouldn’t surprise us: since they came to power, the Tories have relied rather heavily on PR. I thought Blair was pretty bad for his addiction to PR but Cameron is a former PR man; he lives and breathes it.  Never before has a someone with a background in PR occupied the highest office in the land. It is a first. But his efforts to make use of PR looks a little tired and clichéd.

Teachers have gone on strike before, yet given the rhetoric coming from the mouths of the Tories, it would seem that this was the very first time that teachers have voted for industrial action. Teachers are now painted variously as “irresponsible” and “selfish” people who are more concerned with their unions than with teaching. Predictably,  right wing commentators like  the Daily Telegraph’s Hon Tobes and Katharine Burbalsingh have chimed in with their smears and dark mutterings of “leftist conspiracies”. I won’t bother to quote or link to their blogs but needless to say the blogs all attract the usual rubbish from their braindead readership about banning trade unions and how the ‘left’ is ‘destroying education’. 

Burbalsingh’s blog draws on this Torygraph article by Graham Paton et al. In it, he accuses the National Union of Teachers (NUT) of “bullying” headteachers into going on strike. The opening paragraph reads,

The National Union of Teachers (NUT) has written to schools throughout England and Wales telling them they could be in breach of employment law and health and safety regulations if they keep schools open during the pensions-related dispute.

What this paragraph doesn’t tell you is that Gove, resembling a weak-kneed version of Kitchener, has suggested that parents could volunteer to keep schools open. What Gove overlooked was the fact that anyone who works in a school needs to have a Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) check. Any headteacher who allows parents to act as ersatz teachers would be breaking the law. This is not about the omnipresent ‘red tape’. This is a matter of child protection. The NUT was right to warn headteachers of such issues. Indeed, just because someone is a parent, it doesn’t necessarily follow that they cannot be child-abusers as well.

Further down the article,

As tensions between ministers and union activists escalated, schools were warned against bringing in supply teachers to cover for striking teachers and told any moves to plug gaps in the timetable with permanent staff would be “very damaging” to morale.

But then who says that supply teachers aren’t and cannot be members of trade unions? It’s a terrible presumption.

The strike is only for one day but to hear Tory commentators talk, you’d think it was for a month. As someone pointed out to me the other day, no Tory had a problem with the days lost for the Royal Wedding. Indeed the Tory press has depicted the teacher’s strike as a regular occurrence. The last such strike was in 2008. This is what the Guardian said in 2010 when the NASUWT threatened to strike,

The last teachers’ strike was in April 2008, when at least 1 million children in 8,000 schools went without lessons after the NUT, which represents more than half of the profession, clashed with the government over a pay deal that it said would leave its members worse off. It was the first national teachers’ strike for 21 years.

That’s right, before 2008, teachers hadn’t voted for a national strike for 21 years!

The Sun’s tone is as you’d expect,

IT is time to make a stand.

 On Thursday, a hardcore of militant teachers will try to shut all Britain’s 23,000 state schools by striking over pensions.

 It would harm pupils and cause family childcare chaos.

The Sun says this cynical strike must not succeed.

Today we call on parents and the majority of moderate teachers to keep schools open.

 For decades, education has been in the grip of hardline teaching unions.

There’s one thing missing from this leader: an image of Winston Churchill giving the ‘V’ Sign. In typically hysterical fashion, the Scum have dubbed the strike “The Summer of Hate”. You will recall from this blog, that the word “hate” has now been conscripted to serve ideological masters. For years the US right in have used the word in the same way to claim the moral high ground. Is it childish? You bet it is.

Even Ed Miliband has said the strike is wrong. Are we still in the 1980’s? Milly Band says,

You do not win public backing for an argument about pensions by inconveniencing the public – especially not while negotiations are ongoing.

 A point has been missed by a country mile here. The government told the public sector workers what it intended to do (while labelling them parasites) and it had no time for negotiation. Only as the strike day approached did the government consider negotiation. Lest we forget, on 17 June, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Danny Alexander preempted negotiations between the government and the unions by announcing the coalition’s intentions for public sector pension ‘reform’.

This Tory-led government has been gunning for education since it came to power. They introduced free schools. They announced that they were going ask Niall Ferguson to rewrite the history syllabus, then it cancelled the Better Schools Programme.  “Won’t someone think of the children”? Won’t someone think of them, indeed.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Conservative Party, Cuts, Education, Government & politics, Journalism, Media, propaganda, Yellow journalism

It’s been a bad week for Michael Gove and I’m laughing my head off

There can be no better example of ministerial incompetence than Michael Gove’s performances this week.  Gove, the Education Secretary and Pob lookalike, first claimed that the money spent on the Better Schools for Britain programme was a ‘waste of taxpayers money’.  On Monday he announced that the programme would be cancelled and cited some examples to add gravitas to his argument. Unfortunately for Gove, his gamble flopped.  If he thought that he was having a pop at one of the last government’s spending commitments and that that would be the end of the matter, it backfired and blew up in his face. Some Conservative backbenchers have expressed their dismay at Gove’s announcement and it seems others are lining up to put the boot in.

Meanwhile Toby Young has gone off half-cocked (so what’s so unusual about that?) and is crowing with delight at Gove’s announcement. Pity he didn’t take a closer look at what was being said instead of acting as Gove’s cheerleader. Young also appears to have missed the fact that some Tory MPs had condemned Gove’s announcement. These MPs realise that they could lose a considerable number of votes because of this.

In a later blog, Young says that public schools should be forced to “reserve 25% of their places for the poor“. He is trying to appear reasonable after getting behind Gove’s plans but his thinking is muddled; informed entirely by his own social position (though he didn’t go to public school).

This policy would, at a stroke, reignite the engine of social mobility in the UK and ensure the survival of Britain’s public schools for generations to come.

Yeah? How did you work that out? So what will happen to those others who aren’t lucky enough to form part of that 25%? You didn’t think about that – did you?

Gove also faces legal challenges from local authorities too according to this article from the Daily Mail.

The reason behind Gove’s announcement was ideological: it follows on from his pledge to create funds for so-called ‘free schools’. It is likely that any money that wasn’t being spent on repairing run-down state schools was going to be used to fund his pet project.  But are Gove’s copious apologies enough? They may placate some people but it is clear, at least to me, that this man is not fit to run an office of state.

1 Comment

Filed under Government & politics