Who is Vince Cable trying to fool?

One of the worst things that the New Labour government did was to take responsibility for the universities out of the hands of the Department for Education and place them under the authority of the Department for Business, Skills and Innovation. This told us exactly how the government regarded universities: as degree factories that produced workers for white collar jobs in banking, business and customer services. Education for its own sake was discouraged and those embarking on a journey through higher education were encouraged to take up degrees in subjects like  Business Studies. The idea here was to produce ‘entrepreneurs’. But not everyone can be an entrepreneur.

So imagine my disgust when I heard Vince Cable announce that higher education funding would be cut and graduates would be subjected to a higher rate of tax on completion of their studies.  We know that social mobility decreased during the last years of the New Labour government and the numbers of working class HE students fell too. Here is one of the biggest myths about HE

Graduates earned on average £100,000 more than non-graduates in their life-time, Cable said, and there are significant premiums for degrees such as medicine

Yes, but that’s medicine. What about those with degrees in History, English or the Arts? Those graduates will be lucky to earn that kind of money, if they ever earn it at all. Someone isn’t living in the real world here and I think it’s Dr. Cable.

There is also provision being made for more private universities. To date, there is only one private university in the country and that is the University of Buckingham . A favourite of Thatcher, Buckingham is known for its rigidly conservative approach to education. You will find no arts or philosophy courses here. Oh no, it’s business, business, business, medicine and a bit of science.

Cable also announced that more degree courses will last 2 years rather than the current 3 or 4 years.  In my mind, this is something of a con-trick. Aaron Porter of Leftfootforward says,

Dr Cable is right that that greater flexibility is needed in higher education in combination with greater fairness, and this includes expanding the range of study options and modes. However, it would be wrong to force students to take two year degrees or to stay at home because they would not otherwise be able to afford the cost of university. The re-opening of a two tier system would not be in line with his stated aim of greater fairness for students.

That’s Aaron Porter as in the toady president of the National Union of Students Aaron Porter.

Universities have been a favourite target of Tory governments. In the past they have been accused of being ‘hotbeds’ of  extreme left wing activism or delivering courses that have no [economic] value.  Sociology was one such course singled out by the Tories in the 70’s and 80’s as being part of a left-wing conspiracy to undermine the fabric of society. Recently, Media Studies has been subjected to the same vilification. Perhaps the underlying reason for the hatred of Media Studies has little to do with people ‘poncing about with cameras’  and more to do with opposition to creating a more media literate society. It is easier to con people who are less media literate with digital editing tricks than those who have been exposed to media studies.

A graduate tax will put many more students off going to university. The hardest hit by these proposals will be people from low income families. Mature students will also be put off by the imposition of a graduate tax. so if you come from a family that owns a £968,000 property and has an income of £500,000 pa, you’re okay. If you’re 26, single and on benefits, forget it. The mature undergraduate student will become a thing of the past.

The various university groups have expressed their dismay at the proposals. Wendy Platt of the Russell Group said,

“It would lead to many years before revenue from the tax became available so until then there would be a requirement for a very major upfront investment in universities by government – a very costly solution.”

I was lucky, I got a grant to go to university. It wasn’t worth much but  it was something. Unlike today’s students, I didn’t have to pay tuition fees nor did I have to burden myself with a student loan. I was also a mature student. Education is an investment for the future and by restricting education to those who can afford it, spits in the eye of a fair society.

Big Society, my arse.


Filed under Government & politics

9 responses to “Who is Vince Cable trying to fool?

  1. beastrabban

    Reblogged this on Beastrabban’s Weblog and commented:
    I’ve reblogged this piece on the way Vince Cable removed the universities from the education department and placed them in the Department of Business, Skills and Innovation because it is also somewhat reminiscent like another event in the history of the Third Reich: Heidegger’s speech when elected Rector of Freiburg University. Heidegger was the German existentialist philosopher, who briefly gave his full support to the Nazis, proclaiming ‘Ich Sage Ja!’ (I Say Yes!) He was then appointed rector to Freiburg University to assist with its gleichschaltung in the new, Nazi state.
    In his speech, Heidegger praised the Labour Camps, Labour Service and their spiritual connection to the universities.:
    ‘There is a new reality. The fact that our high school should be open to the new educational powers of the Labour Service symbolizes the new reality. Camps and schools intend to gather … the educational powers of our people in order to obtain that new unity in which the nation will drive towards its destiny under the State.’
    I’ve already pointed out how the Nazi Labour Service, the Reichsarbeitsdienst, was a precursor to the current government’s workfare policies. I’ve also seen more recently an article that stated that the coalition wanted to open schools up to workfare. So, this is another parallel the Coalition’s educational and unemployment policies have with those of the Nazis.

    • Was Vince cable not long gone from the Labour party before the move of universities to the Department of Business, Skills and Innovation. Was it not a move by Blair to give his pal Mandelson control of them?

      • Cable was a member of the Labour Party in the 70s. He joined the SDP in the 80s. Dr .Cable’s prescription was to increase taxation for graduates and continue to destroy the HE sector by cutting research funding in social sciences, arts and humanities subjects. It is very much a neoliberal idea to shackle HE to Business and Enterprise rather than keep it within Education, where it belongs. For these people education must serve some kind of objective function. That is to say, it must either serve the economic interests of business, industry or be placed in the service of law enforcement and crime detection.

  2. Pingback: Who is Vince Cable trying to fool? | Welfare, D...

  3. Reblogged this on Vox Political and commented:
    Read Beastrabban’s comment to understand why I’m reblogging this.

  4. Big Bill

    I think this has more to do with reducing the number of graduates available as an excuse to bring in grads from India and Korea who’ll be thrilled to live six to a room and earn minimum wage as they’ll be able to send what there will be regarded as fortunes to their home countries. We won’t need graduates, not home-grown ones anyway who want paying a salary they can keep a family on. No, those days are gone. This is the point of Mode 4 Immigration, look it up.

    • Overseas students do indeed pay more to be educated in this country. Yet this government is making it harder for them to do so. To say that the government’s HE policy is confused is putting it lightly: it’s a mess and cuts have been made for purely ideological reasons. If we limit funding for home students, this means that our knowledge base in danger of sliding backwards to the 19th century or earlier.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s